The Stages of Meaningful Use and Its Implementation in Nursing Practice

The concept of Meaningful Use (MU) was introduced as a component of the Wellbeing Information Innovation for Economic and Clinical Wellbeing (HITECH) Act, aiming to further develop healthcare quality, security, and reasonability through the adoption of Electronic Wellbeing Records (EHRs). This evaluation will investigate the stages of MU and its implementation in nursing practice, drawing insights from open resources and general practices found in healthcare settings.

Stage 1: Data Capture and Sharing

The primary objective of the MU stage has been the effective capture and efficient sharing of data. It requires every single piece of the patient’s information including, socioeconomics, clinical history, medication and lab results to be electronically stored. Within the field of nursing, this step emphasizes specific, operationalized data elements captured in the EHR. Clinical caregivers are expected to play a significant role in this process since they are usually the first point of sight within the patient hierarchy (Rathert et al., 2019). Within this step, the use of EHRs is accompanied by chaperons to document patient information more than necessary which leads to fewer mistakes and improved care.

Stage 2: Advanced Clinical Processes

Stage 2 builds on the first requirements by focusing on more sophisticated clinical operations. This includes the implementation of the emotionally consistent organization of clinical decisions, the use of electronic medications orders, and the enabling of electronic exchange between health care providers. In nursing practice, this stage controls the threshold in terms of informed decisions. Professionals access the up-to-date consent from the patient to his/her information and the clinical knowledge. The latter does not compromise the careful medication administration and monitoring of the patient’s condition.

Stage 3: Improved Outcomes

The final stage of MU focuses on using EHR innovation to further develop wellbeing outcomes. It involves demonstrating that the use of EHR contributes to improved patient care. This includes ensuring the security of patient information, providing patients with permission to their well-being records, and using data examination to further youngster care quality (Rathert et al., 2019). Chaperons contribute to this stage by engaging in patient education, promoting patient permission to their well-being records, and participating in the examination of well-being data to see models and regions for advancement.

Challenges and Solutions in Implementation

Implementing MU in nursing practice isn’t without challenges. One key test is the initial protection from change, as transitioning from paper-based to electronic plans can torment. Agreeable training and backing are principal to work with this transition. Another test is ensuring the integrity and security of patient data (Abd-alrazaq et al., 2019). Continuous education and adherence to security conventions are fundamental for addressing this concern.

Impact on Patient Care and Nursing Practice

The implementation of MU has on an exceptionally fundamental level impacted patient care and nursing practice. EHRs have streamlined the documentation cycle, making patient information more open and reducing the likelihood of bumbles (Brown, 2022). This straightforwardness has improved the efficiency of care conveyance. Additionally, EHRs have worked with better communication among healthcare accessories, leading to more coordinated and integrated patient care.

Conclusion

The stages of Meaningful Use have altogether influenced nursing practice by enhancing the quality, security, and proficiency of patient care. While challenges exist in the implementation cycle, the benefits to the extent that improved patient outcomes and streamlined work processes are fundamental. As healthcare continues to push, the occupation of EHRs and the principles of MU will remain essential in driving forward the quality and adequacy of nursing care.

References

Abd-alrazaq, A. A., Bewick, B. M., Farragher, T., & Gardner, P. (2019). Factors that affect the use of electronic personal health records among patients: A systematic review. International Journal of Medical Informatics, 126(3), 164–175. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2019.03.014

Brown, P. (2022). The Impact of Electronic Health Records Meaningful Use on Patient Safety and Satisfaction – ProQuest. Www.proquest.com. https://www.proquest.com/openview/c31e64fa91fcf4a5be7c4e93c57881bd/1?pq-origsite=gscholar&cbl=18750&diss=y

Rathert, C., Porter, T. H., Mittler, J. N., & Fleig-Palmer, M. (2019). Seven years after meaningful use: Physicians’ and nurses’ experiences with electronic health records. Health Care Management Review, 44(1), 30–40. https://doi.org/10.1097/hmr.0000000000000168