Introduction

Dorsey and Murdaugh’s commitments have affected nursing practice, especially in grasping well-being conduct and advancing health (Jean-Baptiste, 2022). Their speculations offer a new viewpoint on the interaction of individual activities, social conditions, and well-being results. This task investigates how these hypothetical structures can be applied to current nursing, intending to further develop well-being results and guide proof-based practice.

By digging into their thoughts, NURS600 Task 1.2 features the pertinence of their speculations intending to key parts of nursing, like well-being advancement and patient strengthening. This conversation highlights how their bits of knowledge assist medical attendants with creating patient-focused care techniques customized to people, families, and networks’ remarkable requirements.

Rationale for Selection

Dorsey and Murdaugh were picked for their basic responsibilities to nursing theory, essentially focusing on prosperity direction and progression (Froncek, 2020). Their work conquers any issues between individual exercises, sociocultural components, and prosperity results, presenting a sweeping perspective on nursing care.

Their theoretical models highlight a broad method for managing patient thought, tending to scratch parts like patient reinforcing, social determinants of prosperity, and preventive thought philosophies. These contemplations change flawlessly with the objectives of NURS600 Errand 1.2, which hopes to integrate nursing hypotheses into patient thought to additionally foster prosperity results. By separating their work, clinical chaperons can gain critical pieces of information for developing clinical capacities across various practice settings.

Overview of Dorsey and Murdaugh’s Theories

Dorsey and Murdaugh’s hypotheses underline the interconnectedness of individual activities, ecological impacts, and well-being results. Their systems feature self-viability, well-being convictions, and social help as fundamental well-being conduct parts (Dickey et al., 2022).

Key Principles of Their Theories:

• Recognizing the importance of social and cultural contexts in health behaviors.
• Encouraging patient empowerment and collaboration between nurses and patients.
• Promoting disease prevention and well-being through holistic care models.

By applying these principles, nurses can better understand the complex interactions between patients’ behaviors, social conditions, and health outcomes. These theories offer a robust foundation for creating interventions that are not only effective but also patient-centered.

Strategies for Presentation

Engaging the Audience

It is essential to keep the audience engaged when presenting Dorsey and Murdaugh’s theories. Begin by introducing their backgrounds and the key aspects of their theoretical models, such as self-efficacy and social networks (Heinsch et al., 2021).

Using Visual Aids

Charts, diagrams, and infographics can make complex concepts more accessible. For instance, visual representations of the relationship between health beliefs and outcomes can help illustrate their relevance to nursing practice.

Real-Life Examples

Sharing anecdotes or case studies bridges the gap between theory and practice. This approach helps the audience relate to the concepts and understand how they apply to real-world nursing scenarios.

Interactive Elements

Incorporating group discussions and Q&A sessions encourages deeper engagement and allows participants to clarify their understanding. Simplifying theoretical concepts into digestible pieces using metaphors or analogies can further enhance comprehension.

Conclusion

Dorsey and Murdaugh’s work provides a significant guide to figuring out the sensitive harmony between conduct, climate, and well-being. Their hypotheses, as examined in NURS600 Task 1.2, furnish medical attendants with the apparatuses to make custom-made mediations that address patients’ singular requirements while advancing wellbeing and forestalling disease.

By introducing their thoughts plainly and engagingly, attendants and understudies can get a handle on the meaning of these hypotheses in working on tolerant consideration. Eventually, Dorsey and Murdaugh’s bits of knowledge rouse customized and all-encompassing methodologies that raise nursing practice across assorted medical care settings.

References

Dickey, S., Krienke, L., Rosemberg, M. A., & Bell, S. A. (2022). Home-based care and mental health during a disaster: A qualitative analysis. Journal of Applied Gerontology, 42(2), 213–220.
https://doi.org/10.1177/07334648221128559

Froncek, J. (2020). Incarcerated adults’ perceptions of remaining opiate-free upon Release. Regis University Student Publications (Comprehensive Collection).
https://epublications.regis.edu/theses/986/

Heinsch, M., Wyllie, J., Carlson, J., Wells, H., Tickner, C., & Kay-Lambkin, F. (2021). Theories informing eHealth implementation: Systematic review and typology classification. Journal of Medical Internet Research, 23(5), e18500.
https://doi.org/10.2196/18500

Jean-Baptiste, D. M. (2022). Individuals with sickle cell disease using SBAR as a communication tool: Secondary data analysis. Repository.escholarship.umassmed.edu.
https://doi.org/10.13028/kyap-9c16