To evaluate whether sources are credible,, the criteria should be based on sources that are not more than 5 years old. You should ensure the research you conduct is current and up to the present. If the journals are academic or peer-reviewed, they must be reliable and satisfy the requirements. The criteria should not comprise sources on websites with the ending .com, .org. The websites you should use must have names that have the ending .gov or .edu. NURS FPX 4030 Assessment 2 Determining the Credibility of Evidence and Resources is reliable to test the authenticity of websites is to take the test CRAAP. CRAAP is a term that means credibility, validity, relevance in accuracy, relevance, and intent (Lenker 2017). The nurse who was hired to the Villa-Health program could have complied with the above guidelines to ensure that the sources she used were trustworthy and also if she instructed her students on how to search for these sources.
Analyzing the Credibility and Relevance of Evidence and Resources
The first resource chosen for implementation was the site MedlinePlus. The site is updated on a regularly, with the most recent update coming the month of December in 2021. The domain of the website is .gov is reliable to use. The other resource utilized was the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) that has details directly related to sepsis. The website is frequently updated, as well as the website .gov is reliable.
NURS FPX 4030 Assessment 2 Determining the Credibility of Evidence and Resources
The next source is taken from the Journal of Nursing Care Quality. The article (Lenker 2017) provides pertinent information about sepsis as well as the utilization of Sepsis Identification Tools to enhance the treatment and intervention time and reduce mortality. The article was peer reviewed and published in the past five years. The most recent article was discovered in ProQuest. ProQuest database. The article (Joshi 2021) was peer-reviewed, and published within the past five years. The article discusses a research study that involves healthcare professionals who wear sensors that monitor the vitals of patients. Vital signs in a patient can be an early sign of sepsis.
Integrating Credible Evidence in an evidence-based practice
In the incorporation of research-based practices health professionals need to depend on trustworthy sources. Nurses have access to a range of models based on evidence that have been developed by health professionals to aid them in implementing the principles of evidence-based practice. There are a variety of approaches used to manage data in order to provide the principles of evidence-based patient care. It is the Iowa Model is widely used to implement evidence-based practices. It’s a model which helps to identify problems that need to be addressed, identify solutions and make adjustments (Buckwalter 2017,).
Conclusion
In the NURS FPX 4030 Assessment 2 Determining the Credibility of Evidence and Resources end is clear that evidence-based practice in nursing is crucial. As a nurse credible research sources is important because patient safety and outcomes are at stake. The advice above must be used to find reliable sources. Additionally, ensuring that the sources have been peer-reviewed and published in 5 years ago can help ensure that they are reliable sources.
References
Buckwalter, K. C., Cullen, L., Hanrahan, K., Kleiber, C., McCarthy, A. M., Rakel, B., Steelman, V., Tripp-Reimer, T., Tucker, S., & Authored on behalf of the Iowa Model Collaborative (2017). Iowa Model of Evidence-Based Practice: Revisions and Validation. Worldviews on evidence-based nursing, 14(3), 175–182. https://doi.org/10.1111/wvn.12223
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention [Internet]. Atlanta (GA): U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. Sepsis: clinical information; 2020 Dec 7 [cited 2021 Sept 9]; [about 7 screens]. Available from: https://www.cdc.gov/sepsis/clinicaltools/index.html
Joshi, M., Ashrafian, H., Khan, S., & Darzi, A. (2020). Sepsis. The Lancet, 396(10265), 1805. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(20)31608-1
Lenker, M. (2017). Developmentalism: Learning as the basis for evaluating information. Portal: Libraries and the Academy, 17(4), 721-737. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1353/pla.2017.0043
MedlinePlus [Internet]. Bethesda (MD): National Library of Medicine (US); [updated Jun 24; cited 2020 Jul 1]. Available from: https://medlineplus.gov/.
Threatt, D. (2020). Improving Sepsis Bundle Implementation Times. Journal of Nursing Care Quality, 35 (2), 135-139. doi: 10.1097/NCQ.0000000000000430.
