Introduction to Voluntary Accreditation

Intentional license is an interaction through which medical services associations look for acknowledgment from outer bodies like The Joint Commission (TJC), the Medical care Offices Certification Program (HFAP), or the Certification Relationship for Ambulatory Medical care (AAC). While not mandatory, certification offers various advantages, including establishing organized frameworks and procedures to work on quality, security, and authoritative execution. As featured in BHA FPX 4006 Evaluation 4, license furnishes medical care associations with a system for continuous improvement and adjusts their tasks to perceived benchmarks for greatness (Hussein et al., 2021).

Importance of Accreditation in Healthcare

Definition and Purpose

License involves an outer, independent assessment of a medical care association’s strategies, practices, and results to guarantee consistence with laid out standards. This interaction shows an association’s obligation to delivering care that fulfills or surpasses guideline medical services values. For instance, The Joint Commission, a leading accrediting body, surveys medical services associations on quiet management, wellbeing protocols, and execution improvement initiatives. License approves that an association gives top caliber, safe consideration to patients while meeting stakeholder and regulatory assumptions (The Joint Commission, 2024).

Types of Accreditation

Accreditation extends beyond hospitals to ambulatory surgery centres, clinical laboratories, and primary care clinics. HFAP, authorised by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), accredits acute care facilities and focuses on customer service, patient safety, and organisational efficiency. Similarly, AAAHC accredits ambulatory care organisations, ensuring compliance with the highest standards for patient safety, care quality, and operational excellence (Accreditation & Quality Compliance Center, 2024).

Accreditation Requirements

Standards and Criteria

Healthcare accreditation standards encompass patient safety, quality of care, and operational efficiency. Accrediting bodies like The Joint Commission and HFAP evaluate organisations on infection control, medication safety, and evidence-based patient care practices. For instance, risk management requirements include implementing safety measures to prevent patient harm, such as falls, medication errors, and surgical complications (Alhawajreh et al., 2023).

Leadership and Governance

Accreditation also emphasises governance and leadership, requiring organisations to establish competent leadership, strategic planning frameworks, and systems for quality management. This includes ensuring staff qualifications, providing ongoing education, and fostering a culture of continuous improvement (Sperling & Pikkel, 2020). These standards ensure that healthcare providers remain equipped to meet the evolving complexities of patient care.

Accreditation and Regulatory Compliance

While accreditation and regulatory compliance aim to protect patient safety and ensure quality care, their focus differs. Regulatory compliance, enforced by government bodies, sets minimum standards for safety and quality, such as CMS’s Conditions of Participation (CoPs) for Medicare and Medicaid. In contrast, accreditation, though voluntary, often exceeds regulatory requirements and reflects an organisation’s commitment to excellence (Dunbar et al., 2021).

For instance, accreditation standards for infection prevention and control align with regulatory guidelines but go further by promoting innovative practices to reduce healthcare-associated infections. This alignment benefits organisations by demonstrating their dedication to quality and safety, enhancing patient trust and organisational reputation (Garcia et al., 2022).

Benefits of Accreditation

Accreditation provides numerous advantages for healthcare organisations, as emphasised in BHA FPX 4006 Assessment 4:

• Enhanced Patient Outcomes: Accreditation standards promote patient-centered care, timely treatment, and evidence-based interventions.
• Increased Organizational Efficiency: Adherence to quality management systems and performance audits fosters operational excellence.
• Improved Reputation: Accreditation demonstrates an organisation’s commitment to high standards, instilling confidence in patients, stakeholders, and regulatory bodies.
• Regulatory Alignment: Accredited organisations often meet or exceed regulatory requirements, ensuring seamless compliance with legal mandates.

Best Practices for Accreditation

Quality Management Systems

Implementing robust quality management systems (QMS) is essential for meeting accreditation standards. QMS includes procedures for performance appraisals, clinical outcome analysis, and patient satisfaction surveys. These practices help organisations identify areas for improvement and optimise care delivery processes (Friedel et al., 2023).

Staff Education and Training

Ongoing professional development ensures that staff remain competent and informed about the latest healthcare methodologies and regulatory updates. Training programs should address infection control, patient safety, and emergency protocols, reinforcing compliance with accreditation standards (Mlambo et al., 2021).

Internal Audits and Self-Assessments

Regular internal audits and self-assessments allow organisations to identify compliance gaps and address them proactively before external surveys. These evaluations are critical for ensuring readiness and maintaining continuous compliance (Mossel et al., 2021).

Other Accreditation Organizations

Beyond The Joint Commission, HFAP offers valuable accreditation services for hospitals, ambulatory surgical centres, and clinical laboratories. HFAP standards align with CMS requirements, ensuring facilities meet federal quality and safety guidelines. Accreditation through HFAP enhances organisational credibility and encourages a culture of continuous improvement (Al-Sayedahmed et al., 2021).

Additionally, HFAP promotes evidence-based practices and performance improvement initiatives, contributing to better clinical outcomes and patient safety. For example, HFAP’s standards for clinical laboratories focus on proficiency testing and quality management systems, ensuring reliable testing and improved patient care.

Conclusion

Accreditation is a comprehensive process that requires time, resources, and commitment but delivers substantial benefits. It validates patient care processes’ quality, safety, and efficacy, enhancing patient trust and organisational reputation. As discussed in BHA FPX 4006 Assessment 4, accreditation fosters a culture of continuous improvement, aligning healthcare organisations with the highest standards of excellence. By adhering to accreditation requirements, healthcare facilities can achieve better patient outcomes, regulatory compliance, and operational efficiency, making accreditation a worthwhile investment for the future of healthcare.

Read more about BHA FPX 4006 Assessment 3 Compliance Trainingfor complete information about this class.

References

Accreditation & Quality Compliance Center. (2024). Accreditation & quality compliance center.

Accreditation Quality Compliance Center. (2020). CMS approves merger of HFAP with Accreditation Commission for Health Care | Accreditation & Quality Compliance Center.

Al-alawy, K., Moonesar, I. A., Obaid, H. A. M., Gaafar, R., & Bawadi, E. I. A.-A. (2021). A mixed-methods study to explore the impact of hospital accreditation. Inquiry: The Journal of Health Care Organization, Provision, and Financing, 58.

Al-Sayedahmed, H., Al-Tawfiq, J., Al-Dossary, B., & Al-Yami, S. (2021). Impact of accreditation certification on improving healthcare quality and patient safety at Johns Hopkins Aramco Healthcare. Global Journal on Quality and Safety in Healthcare, 4(3), 117–122.

Alhawajreh, M. J., Paterson, A. S., & Jackson, W. J. (2023). Impact of hospital accreditation on quality improvement in healthcare: A systematic review. Public Library of Sciences One, 18(12).

Berger, S., Saut, A. M., & Berssaneti, F. T. (2020). Using patient feedback to drive quality improvement in hospitals: A qualitative study. British Medical Journal Open, 10(10).

Bracewell, N., & Winchester, D. E. (2021). Accreditation in health care: Does it make any difference to patient outcomes? British Medical Journal Quality & Safety, 1–3.

Braun, B. I., Chitavi, S. O., Suzuki, H., Soyemi, C. A., & Asensio, M. P. (2020). Culture of safety: Impact on improvement in infection prevention process and outcomes. Current Infectious Disease Reports, 22(12).

Dunbar, P., Browne, J. P., & O’Connor, L. (2021). Determinants of regulatory compliance in health and social care services: A systematic review protocol. Health Research Board Open Research, 4(4).

Endalamaw, A., Khatri, R. B., Mengistu, T. S., Erku, D., Wolka, E., Zewdie, A., & Assefa, Y. (2024). A scoping review of continuous quality improvement in the healthcare system: Conceptualization, models and tools, barriers and facilitators, and impact. BioMed Central Health Services Research, 24(1).

Frank, J. R., Taber, S., Zanten, M. van, Scheele, F., & Blouin, D. (2020). The role of accreditation in 21st century health professions education: Report of an international consensus group. BioMed Central Medical Education, 20(S1).

Friedel, A. L., Siegel, S., Kirstein, C. F., Gerigk, M., Bingel, U., Diehl, A., Steidle, O., Haupeltshofer, S., Andermahr, B., Chmielewski, W., & Andermahr, I. K. (2023). Measuring patient experience and satisfaction—how are we doing it, and why does it matter? A comparison of European and U.S. American approaches. Healthcare, 11(6).

Garcia, R., Barnes, S., Boukidjian, R., Goss, L. K., Spencer, M., Septimus, E. J., Wright, M.-O., Munro, S., Reese, S. M., Fakih, M. G., Edmiston, C. E., & Levesque, M. (2022). Recommendations for change in infection prevention programs and practice. American Journal of Infection Control, 50(12), 1281-1295.

Goorts, K., Dizon, J., & Milanese, S. (2021). The effectiveness of implementation strategies for promoting evidence-informed interventions in allied healthcare: A systematic review. BioMed Central Health Services Research, 21(1).

Hunt, D. F., Dunn, M., Harrison, G., & Bailey, J. (2021). Ethical considerations in quality improvement: Key questions and a practical guide. British Medical Journal Open Quality, 10(3).

Hussein, M., Pavlova, M., Ghalwash, M., & Groot, W. (2021). The impact of hospital accreditation on healthcare quality: A systematic literature review. BioMed Central Health Services Research, 21(1).

Levitan, S. E., & Schoenbaum, S. C. (2021). Patient-centered care: Achieving higher quality by designing care through the patient’s eyes. Israel Journal of Health Policy Research, 10(1), 1–5.

Mlambo, M., Silén, C., & McGrath, C. (2021). Lifelong learning and nurses’ continuing professional development, a meta-synthesis of the literature. BioMed Central Nursing, 20(62), 1–13.

Mossel, L. H., Ahaus, K., Welker, G., & Gans, R. (2021). Understanding how and why audits work in improving the quality of hospital care: A systematic realist review. Public Library of Sciences One, 16(3), 1–25.

Samardzic, M., Doekhie, K. D., & Wijngaarden, J. D. H. (2020). Interventions to improve team effectiveness within health care: A systematic review of the past decade. Human Resources for Health, 18(2).

Sperling, D., & Pikkel, R. B. (2020). Promoting patients’ rights through hospital accreditation. Israel Journal of Health Policy Research, 9(1).

The Joint Commission. (2024). Joint commission accreditation | the joint commission.