Among all the NURS FPX 6412 Assessment 1 EHR tools utilized and addressed in this project, any method or process for electronically capturing, processing, and transferring patient information is one of the most actively used.
Functions
It also serves as a tool to encourage electronic medication and treatment administration. Spark notes for nurses to be more attentive to the parts where the life-threatening conditions of patients are shown. Electronic Care Flow Sheets documentation is kept (Kataria & Ravindran, 2020).
It then proceeds to construct its e-charts for the patients in question. This e-charting can harbor all types of patient data. It also has the treatments that the patient has had. If the patient has no medication administration history, med PRN (Pro et al.) is chosen if the patient has documentation (Li et al.,2021). If more treatments or medications were administered, then there are checkboxes for each subsequent treatment or medication. Some checkboxes can be completed to choose the so-called patient-specific efficiency. Fulfilling a treatment order involves placing check marks in checkbox strips for every executed order.
NURS FPX 6412 Assessment 1 Medication Prescribed
It also serves as a reminder that signaling when the vital signs need to be taken and treated is a sign. If the medication prescribed to a specific client is inadequate, a reorder button is given to communicate the order. It also protects patients’ health information by updating them against human interjection. These mistakes may include entering the patient’s details, the patient’s health state, and the updates made. It also comprises the medicine administration route the caregivers use, any operations and non-operations made, and lands assumed results or repercussions. NURS FPX 6412 Assessment 1 also enables the healthcare provider to provide documentation against any medical/surgical order not complied with. It includes all the orders that have not been met, are delayed or on hold, or those with PRN labels. They are integrated into the electronic health record of the dwelling’s residents to provide constant updates and inputs. It makes it simple for nurses to manage care provision and reduces direct communication with the physicians (Quinn et al., 2019).
eTAR Supporting Strategic Plan
Encompassing the strategic thinking of pragmatic patient management issues, eTAR takes part significantly in the EPDS. The core rationale for strategic planning is the safety of patients in the independent practice. ETAR transfers the registered data to its gadgets to keep the process automated and efficient throughout (Robertson et al., 2019). The new orders are sorted and placed in an urgent 72-hour Order Category. They must be processed and delivered immediately wherever EMR or NetSolutions Clinical Decisions software is installed. The fact that it is a practical instrument helps patients concerned with the protected storage of their data to confirm that the data is stored on a valid site. The patients have also affirmed the legitimacy of the data pertinent to them and return the guarantee that their data will only be disseminated with their consent. They can also quickly refer to the right to every treatment they have given them. Clinical Decision Support (CDS) assists in enhancing care quality and offers care taken to plan providers with pertinent info they could use to make their care delivery more effective.
Assessment of Workflow to Maximize Efficiency
Even though eTAR is a digital collection of information that facilitates success in care provision, it possesses the following characteristics that are convenient for the process. It allows the charting session navigation to be performed using quick links. It obscures the monthly recaps when current orders must be brought back into view. It scales up security by requiring the user to enter two forms of identification each time the patient’s record is accessed. It makes the number of patient data more manageable and accessible to access and utilize efficiently. It populates information such as drug information, teaching, and Black Box warnings when the software is installed.
It alerts the medication treatment to stay operational and manages the review of the patient’s vitals. It sends notifications of the instances when they have to check the vitals. By default, it will turn the latest requirements or PRN for the first 72 hours to address them first. Integrates barcoding to help maintain only critical parts of the patient’s records (Tapuria et al., 2021). All these things are inserted ‘‘afresh’’ to enhance efficiency because as much as they are trying to make the whole process more accessible for the patient, they are also trying to make it as automated as possible. NURS FPX 6412 Assessment 1 brings the multidisciplinary task description of nurses within the reach of people by giving notifications concerning patient updates, necessary vital examinations, administration of medications, and surgical and nonsurgical process maintenance. It controls every move a nurse makes, who posits the danger of human mistakes.
eTAR Contribution to Inter-Professional Care
NURS FPX 6412 Assessment 1 eTAR keeps patient data available to facilitate the ICP model of intentional and diverse patient care by interprofessional teams. In most healthcare facilities, there are appointed interprofessional teams to ensure that the flow of patients is adequately handled. The eTAR helps the interprofessional team document and communicate between the self-organized interdisciplinary team of nurse informatics and physicians and checks whether the patient’s optimum care has been delivered. Its effectiveness is reviewed by Clinical Interprofessional Communication Spaces (MCICS) (Harvard CME, 2019 Quarterly Networking based focus, Quinn et al. 2019). The like are prepared and issued simultaneously to ensure that all team personnel are informed.
Conclusion
Following the above research methods, this research views eTAR as a good EHR tool for maintaining patient information. It also retains the patient’s medication, surgical and non-surgical pathways, and updates on their health status for patient safety. This way, it provides barcodes and other methods to verify the information to ensure the patient details are secure. This facilitates the authorization of patients to access their data conveniently. It also noted the need for patients’ regular physical assessments and updating schedules on the recommended treatment regimens for better performance.
References
Kataria, S., & Ravindran, V. (2020). Electronic health records: A critical appraisal of strengths and limitations. Journal of the Royal College of Physicians of Edinburgh, 50(3), 262–268. https://doi.org/10.4997/jrcpe.2020.309
Li, E., Clarke, J., Neves, A. L., Ashrafian, H., & Darzi, A. (2021). Electronic Health Records, Interoperability and Patient Safety in Health Systems of High-income Countries: A Systematic Review Protocol. BMJ Open, 11(7), e044941. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2020-044941
Ludwikowska, K. (2018). Evidence-based training approach in organizational practice. Modern Management Review. https://doi.org/10.7862/rz.2018.mmr.48
McConeghy, K. W., Cinque, M., White, E. M., Feifer, R. A., Blackman, C., Mor, V., Gravenstein, S., & Zullo, A. R. (2021). Lessons for deprescribing from a nonessential medication hold policy in US nursing homes. Journal of the American Geriatrics Society, 70(2), 429–438. https://doi.org/10.1111/jgs.17512
Quinn, M., Forman, J., Harrod, M., Winter, S., Fowler, K. E., Krein, S. L., Gupta, A., Saint, S., Singh, H., & Chopra, V. (2019). Electronic health records, communication, and data sharing: Challenges and opportunities for improving the diagnostic process. Diagnosis, 6(3), 241–248. https://doi.org/10.1515/dx-2018-0036
Robertson, B., McDermott, C., Star, J., Lewin, L. O., & Spell, N. (2020). Synchronous virtual interprofessional education focused on discharge planning. Journal of Interprofessional Education & Practice, 100388. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.xjep.2020.100388
Tapuria, A., Porat, T., Kalra, D., Dsouza, G., Xiaohui, S., & Curcin, V. (2021). Impact of patient access to their electronic health record: Systematic review. Informatics for Health and Social Care, 46(2), 194–206. https://doi.org/10.1080/17538157.2021.1879810