Community Resources and Best Practices
In NURS FPX6616 Assessment 1 effective coordination in care provision forms an integral part of quality care and hence patient outcomes. The challenges that the health care organizations are bound to pose most of the time are in terms of poorly managed or administered quality care since the arenas are always restricted settings or environments (Lowery, J. C. 2019). The presentation’s General Objective will specifically research on means in which collaborative care can be improved by usage of the community resources. This presentation is intended to lead the healthcare leader on how care coordination might be spirally improved through ethical and legal review, evidence-based interventions, the importance of data-driven collaborative working, and improved care in coordination.
NURS FPX6616 Assessment 1 Situation Analysis
This unique scenario is anchored at the onset of the usual scenario where Paula, a highly occupied hospital/surgery director, is not able to coordinate care simply because she does not have enough time and no time to spare. This case illustrates the problems that arise for doctors to coordinate, for example, the effective transfer of a patient, where there is any nature of insufficiency of facilities. All of this needs to be directed at improving patient outcomes and the quality of the care they receive.
Ethical Issues Analysis
Paula would thus be under situations where there is a check on the allocation of resources, say to the office hours, medical supplies, or professional services for patients. It must ensure that the allocation of resources is done in such a way in which justice and equity come out of determining the medical urgencies of the patients rather than concern for other matters like economic or personal relationships (Coleman, E. A. 2019). Paula needs to learn to respect autonomy and allow the patients to be part and parcel of their treatment. Certainly, once a plan for treatment or change is arrived at, proper consent is necessary, but the offering of all important information can be difficult, particularly to patients who cannot communicate well or make decisions.
Fill Given for getting NURS FPX6616 Assessment 1 with in 24 hours
Paula provides care while she respects and assures the privacy and confidentiality of a patient as he shares information regarding healthcare with other healthcare professionals. She will have to ensure that an adequate degree of protection is given to patient information kept and revealed only on a ‘need-to-know’ basis, so as not to unnecessarily divulge unauthorized information (Coleman, E. A. 2019). Paula is also to be sure that she maximizes the patient’s benefit from her collaborative care while burdening them marginally; the patients are to be provided with timely and appropriate care that in no way causes the patients risks or overburdens them (Rodger, S. 2019).
Patients should be well informed of the benefits and risks of any intervention, treatment, or change of care in place or their health. As a physician, Paula would advance the interest of the patients in the best way possible and be the embodiment of professional practice. This would enhance the resolution of the conflicting consistency by ensuring adherence to virtue ethics and patient caring (Institute of Medicine. 2019). She would ensure that the act would ensure adherence to the standards of conduct in her practice and ensure the development of a climate of honesty, fairness, and strict accountability between the patients and other colleagues.
Legal Issues Analysis
Now NURS FPX6616 Assessment 1 care coordination holds healthcare organizations liable if it is poorly coordinated and it will lead to errors or delayed treatment. As an additional example, the lack of communication between the physicians can lead to a patient sustaining injury or a client having an accident may face legal action against a hospital. The redesign of the collaborative care system and legal standards of care along with the implementation of risk reduction standards may be helpful (Furrow, B., & Greaney, T.,2019). Healthcare organizations are liable for protocols, patient safety (e.g., HIPAA regulations), and Medical treatment data protection standards (e.g., CMS rules), and there are a lot of rules about Physicians’ Licensing (Hooper, R. 2019). The currently operating applications have to adhere to these standards and stay on the correct track otherwise they are supposed to suffer from possible changes, fines, or penalties.
The collaborative care model may have legal implications when the collaborators take up roles and responsibilities that are beyond the scope of professional practices of the professionals involved. Such legal issues as breaking the clinical decision-making or having immediate contact with patients, these issues will not be opened to non-clinical staff like drug use or nursing. This protocol, therefore, should be based on the practice standards delineating the duties of the physician and physician responsibilities. Patient consent laws conforming to collaborative care and disclosure of health information should be thoroughly deliberated (Johnson, S. 2020). For example, the dispensing of patient data to other health practitioners given the approval of the patient or his/her authorized representative could be a proper application of 42 CFR part 2. It can be considered as legal issue and a breach of patient’s privacy rights.
Comparison of Current Outcomes with Best Practices
Smith and Jones did a systematic review to look at different things care coordination included such as shortening the length of the stay and the readmission rates and improving patients’ satisfaction. That evaluation is an evaluation of the strong and the weak points in the current application, and these are a foundation for comparison in brief. On the contrary, cross-sectional research in which the intervention examples were selected from healthcare organizations (Smith and Jones, 2020). Hence, what their studies contributed to is pinpointing the most important elements of a collaborative care system including but not limited to, the system of care management, partnership among different stakeholders, and data analysis. Good Health magazine (NURS FPX6616 Assessment 1). In a clinical practice model, the research hypothesis was tested and demonstrated the methods that have been proven to be successful in improving the health of patients.
Chen and Patel (2020) to enable criteria for comparison of current results and observation by best practices did a meta-analytic analysis. The research is employed to determine the effectiveness of different collaborative models going from transitional settings to inpatient hospitals and examine the influence that they produce over the delivery of care, health, and patient outcomes. The capability to integrate existing practices with best practices and evidence leads to the use of evidence to influence management direction. Also, such cost-efficacy analysis by Brown and Wilson (2019) explained the financial aspects of b collaborative care. The systematic review conducted the analysis of the cost-effectiveness of coordinated care that focused on numerous factors such as funds distribution, expenditures, and results. This assessment which measures the economics of adopting pragmatic approaches, helps in decisions on resource allocation and patterns of investments in monitoring programs.
Evidence-Based Practices
Consequently, the actualization of the evidence-based interventions bearing in mind the fast-paced clinical environment will foster a smooth transition and progress of the patient after discharge. Smart and evidence-based intervention along with educational materials should be the first port of call. What we have to do is simply go through the steps consecutively (Wilson, M. 2019). The method of standard care, or a clinical pathway, is a multidisciplinary and comprehensive model that connotes the highest level of best practice management for patients or illnesses.
The utilization of this system opens a door for care delivery which is in the form of a paradigm for assessing, treatment and care follow-up so this makes treatment effective and the patient results remarkable (Snow, P. 2019). The systemic review assesses the effect of the clinical interventions on the clinician’s practice, the outcome of patients, the length of stay, and the financial expenses of hospitals respectively. As a result, it was determined that the homogeneous treatment, in which better coordination, shorter stays in the hospital, and better results were achieved in different types of medical facilities, was most effective.
NURS FPX6616 Assessment 1 Role of Stakeholders in Intervention
In the case of Paula, who is a chief care officer in a busy medical/surgical department, role definition, and team collaboration were instrumental for the intervention to realize its desired outcomes. These roles are defined and supported by evidence and education as follows: (physicians, nurses, allied health professionals), patients, relatives, administrators, insurers, and community associations). These organizations can be involved in direct patient care, resource allocation, decision-making, or support services and they all play an important role in the success of the intervention. Interprofessional teams combine various professions in the healthcare field who collaborate to provide services to patients (Lowton, K. 2019). These teams ensure effective communication, teamwork, and coordination to ensure quality patient outcomes and care. Every team player provides a peculiar skill, viewpoint, and experience to the healing process. These contribute to the collective approach to patient care.
Explanation of Data-Driven Outcomes
For NURS FPX6616 Assessment 1, who care manager in a department that concentrates on medical operations and surgery, data issuing is critical for improving and analyzing outcomes after the adoption of care coordination and the results that patients give as feedback. Here’s how conclusions from data, including benchmarks and time scales, can be used to describe and support evidence and educational resources, these data go beyond figures; we can see clear objectives and time scale will be a clue for us when evidence examples and educating community resources are collected (Brown, B., & Smith, C. 2019). Data from outcomes in care partnerships include a variety of metrics that measure the impact of Impact on outcomes and experience of patients, quality of care, and organizational output altogether.
Contact Us now for help about NURS FPX6616 Assessment 1
These steps include clinical measures (including the number of admissions, and length of hospital stay), patient-focused outcomes (satisfaction with services, experience, and quality of care), process measurements (adherence to procedures, delay in implementing treatment, and financial measures (monies saved and costs reimbursed) (Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality, 2020). An evaluation process is a valuable tool in a way that data are collected, evaluated, and thereafter analyzed to gage the advancement and results of team care. The length will be variable depending on the result of the impact, the performance, and the likely outcome. where the result of short-term evaluation may not be instantly noticeable, long-term evaluation helps document gradual improvement which can be related to time.
Practices to Sustain Outcomes
For Paula, in my chosen scenario– a healthcare administrator whose unit is a busy medical/surgical department – ensuring that staff continue to deliver ongoing practices to support the outcomes of collaborative care over the long term is paramount. Part of implementing the Continuous Quality Improvement (CQI) process is ongoing monitoring, evaluation, and adjusting the care coordination to maintain and improve outcomes over time.
NURS FPX6616 Assessment 1 includes regularly reviewing the data collection results; analyzing and planning for improvement and adhering to evidence‑based interventions; and regularly scheduling professional and educational staff training. Foster ongoing interprofessional collaboration and communication for patient outcomes by Regularly scheduled meetings, case conferences, care planning, etc, to discuss patients, communicate, and coordinate care (Institute for Healthcare Improvement, 2020). Engaging with patients and families as care partners fosters effective collaboration, joint decision, and implementation of the care plan and related tasks. This includes education, provision of resources, and support to facilitate participation in health decisions and self-care.
References
Armand R.J. Girbes, De, J., Zijlstra, J. G., & Hein, L. (2018). Invalid methods lead to inappropriate conclusions. International Journal for Quality in Health Care, 31(1), 72–72. https://doi.org/10.1093/intqhc/mzy165
Grassini, L. (2017). Participatory water governance between theories and practices: Learning from a community-based initiative in India. International Journal of Water Resources Development, 35(3), 404–429. https://doi.org/10.1080/07900627.2017.1354761
Laufs, J., & Waseem, Z. (2020). Policing in pandemics: A systematic review and best practices for police response to COVID-19. International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction, 51(1), 101812. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijdrr.2020.101812
Liu, W., Yue, X.-G., & Tchounwou, P. B. (2020). Response to the COVID-19 epidemic: The chinese experience and implications for other countries. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 17(7), 2304. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17072304
McElfish, P. A., Yeary, K., Sinclair, K. A., Steelman, S., Esquivel, M. K., Aitaoto, N., Kaholokula, K., Purvis, R. S., & Ayers, B. L. (2019). Best practices for community-engaged research with pacific islander communities in the United States (US) and United States affiliated pacific islands (USAPI): A scoping review. Journal of Health Care for the Poor and Underserved, 30(4), 1302–1330. https://doi.org/10.1353/hpu.2019.0101
Rubinger, L., Gazendam, A., Ekhtiari, S., Nucci, N., Payne, A., Johal, H., Khanduja, V., & Bhandari, M. (2020). Maximizing virtual meetings and conferences: A review of best practices. International Orthopaedics, 44(8), 1461–1466. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00264-020-04615-9
