NHS FPX6004 Assessment 3

You are currently viewing NHS FPX6004 Assessment 3

In NHS FPX6004 Assessment 3 Training Session for Policy Implementation, we’ll focus on nursing staff, recognizing their pivotal role in patient care delivery at Harmony Medical Center (HMC). Nurses are frontline caregivers, offering vital support and medical expertise crucial for patient well-being and recovery. We’ll explore evidence-based strategies to engage and empower nursing staff in effectively implementing new policies and guidelines. Topics include securing staff buy-in, identifying early success indicators, understanding policy impact on daily practices, and nurses’ role in improving patient outcomes. Tailored instructional content and knowledge activities will be provided to support staff in their implementation efforts, fostering a culture of collaboration and excellence at HMC.

Evidence-Based Strategies to Work with Role Group

Below is a summary of evidence-based ways to encourage nursing staff to accept a new policy and practice guidelines:

Education and Training Sessions

According to Cummings et al. (2020), comprehensive nursing education and training sessions that cover the new policy’s objectives and implementation procedures are essential. According to Mazanderani et al. (2021), the active involvement of nurses in development and implementation fosters ownership and buy-in through open dialogue and feedback. According to Dorssen-Boog et al. (2021), role modeling promotes desired behaviors and attitudes among staff members. Additionally, as Harrison et al. (2020) highlight, providing adequate support and resources including training and mentorship boosts staff readiness and confidence.

These evidence-based strategies effectively increase staff buy-in and facilitate the execution of new policies and guidelines. Education and training enhance staff understanding and readiness, while engagement in the development process increases commitment and compliance levels. By modeling desired behaviors and providing support, nursing staff can confidently execute new policies, enhancing patient outcomes and organizational effectiveness. Thus, these evidence-based tactics are vital for successful policy implementation and gaining staff buy-in.

NHS FPX6004 Assessment 3 Policy Implementation

Early indicators of success in implementing new policies and practice guidelines at Harmony Medical Center can be observed through several key avenues. According to Spoon et al. (2020), monitoring compliance rates among nursing staff can shed light on how well they are adjusting to the changes and incorporating them into their daily routines. Higher compliance rates signify the successful adoption and implementation of the new policy. According to Sorber & Abularrage (2021), tracking pertinent quality metrics, such as adherence to foot examination protocols, enables the assessment of the policy’s impact on patient care outcomes. Improvements in these metrics indicate early success in achieving desired objectives and enhancing patient care quality.

Additionally, as Sorensen et al. (2020) highlight, gathering feedback from nursing staff through surveys or focus groups offer crucial perspectives on their experiences with the new policy and guidelines. Positive feedback regarding ease of implementation, perceived benefits, and satisfaction with support resources serves as an early indicator of success. Finally, Monteiro-Soares et al. (2021) emphasize that evaluating patient outcomes, such as decreases in diabetic foot complications or improvements in general health status, provides verifiable proof of the policy’s efficacy in improving patient care. These early indicators collectively help evaluate the effectiveness and acceptance of new policies and guidelines at Harmony Medical Center.

Impact of Policy and Practice Guidelines

The revised MMC policy and practice recommendations, especially in diabetes treatment, have had favorable effects. Regular foot exams and standardized methods may help diabetics avoid ulcers, infections, and amputations (Monteiro-Soares et al., 2021). These standards are expected to improve MMC’s compliance with national criteria, demonstrating its dedication to high-quality care and boosting its reputation as a top healthcare provider. By avoiding diabetic foot problems and hospitalizations, the guidelines may save MMC money and improve resource allocation (Siegel et al., 2020)

Additionally, defined rules and guidelines give nursing personnel structure and boost confidence and job satisfaction. Staff ownership and empowerment improve work environments and retention when they are involved in creation and implementation (Penconek et al., 2021). The new policy and practice standards at MMC improve patient outcomes, benchmark compliance, cost savings, and staff engagement, providing their efficacy and usefulness.

Implementation of the New Policy and Practice Guidelines

The implementation of the new policy and practice guidelines at MMC will involve several key steps:

Training and Education: NHS FPX6004 Assessment 3 Training Session for Policy Implementation to understand the rationale behind the changes and learn practical implementation steps.

Resource Allocation: MMC management will allocate necessary resources, including staffing and educational materials, to support effective implementation.

Communication and Rollout: Clear and consistent communication from MMC leadership will highlight the importance of the new policy and guidelines to all staff members.

Monitoring and Evaluation: Regular monitoring and evaluation mechanisms will be established to assess effectiveness and gather feedback for continuous improvement.

By following these strategies, MMC can successfully integrate the new guidelines into its diabetes care protocols, leading to improved patient outcomes and organizational effectiveness.

Effect on Work Routines and Responsibilities

The new policy and guidelines will reshape nursing staff roles, emphasizing structured protocols for diabetic care. Staff will undergo additional training to ensure competency and adherence to new procedures. Patient education on foot examinations and diabetic foot care will become a key responsibility, enhancing patient understanding and self-care practices. These changes underscore the evolving role of nursing staff in delivering comprehensive and proactive diabetes care.

Interpretation of Complex Policy Considerations

Interpreting complex policy requires attention to detail and clarity. Simplifying concepts aids wider comprehension and informed decision-making. Clear explanations ensure stakeholders understand implications and roles. This fosters adherence and successful implementation within the organization.

New Policy and Quality of Care

The new policy and practice guidelines play a crucial role in enhancing healthcare quality and outcomes for nursing staff. By implementing standardized protocols for foot examinations and diabetic care, these guidelines ensure consistent and evidence-based practices, minimizing variations in care delivery and enabling more accurate assessments and timely interventions for diabetic patients (Sørensen et al., 2020). Additionally, the emphasis on preventive measures, such as regular foot examinations, aids in the early detection of potential complications, thereby averting serious health issues like foot ulcers or infections.

This proactive approach fosters a culture of comprehensive patient care, empowering nursing staff to provide optimal support to diabetic patients and ultimately improving health outcomes and overall quality of care (Armstrong et al., 2023). Moreover, adherence to these guidelines enhances staff confidence and satisfaction in delivering effective care, creating a positive impact across the healthcare environment.

Importance of Role Group in Implementation

The nursing staff, comprising the primary role group, holds a pivotal position in the successful implementation of the new policy and practice guidelines. Their frontline involvement in patient care delivery necessitates their adherence to protocols, including conducting foot examinations and accurately documenting findings (G et al., 2023). Securing their buy-in is critical for their commitment and engagement in integrating new practices into their workflow. To empower them, communication channels should remain open, fostering inclusivity and collaboration, while opportunities for input and involvement in decision-making processes instill a sense of ownership and accountability (Sørensen et al., 2020).

NHS FPX6004 Assessment 3

Furthermore, continuous support, training, and resource provision are essential to equipping nurses with the necessary tools and knowledge to navigate changes effectively (Fujii & Stolt, 2020). This approach fosters confidence and motivation in their ability to implement the guidelines successfully. By valuing and recognizing nurses’ contributions throughout the implementation process, their importance and commitment to achieving desired outcomes are reinforced, ultimately driving the initiative’s success.

Future Vision

Nursing staff emerges as leaders in delivering exemplary diabetic care, embodying a steadfast commitment to new guidelines (Pranata et al., 2021). Their expertise prevents complications and empowers patients to manage their health effectively. As trusted advocates, nurses create supportive environments where patients feel valued and empowered (Heck et al., 2022). Through educational interactions, they nurture a culture of wellness and resilience among diabetic patients. Each foot examination signifies a step towards thriving health for every patient.

Instructional Content and Activities

When planning a NHS FPX6004 Assessment 3 Training Session for Policy Implementation, it’s crucial to cater to participants’ needs and preferences by selecting suitable instructional content, education exercises, and materials. Content should explain the rationale behind new policies, emphasizing their role in enhancing patient outcomes and standardizing care practices, while practical demonstrations provide tangible examples. Interactive activities like group discussions, case studies, and role-playing keep participants engaged and reinforce learning.

Varied materials such as manuals, slideshows, and checklists support the content and activities, ensuring accessibility and relevance. By integrating these elements, training sessions effectively convey information, facilitate active learning, and enhance participant retention and application of new skills.

Get Related Assessment: NURS FPX9100 Assessment 1 Topic Approval Form

Effectiveness of Activities

The training session activities are designed to meet the specific needs of nursing staff implementing the new policy and practice guidelines. Interactive discussions foster a collaborative learning environment, allowing participants to share experiences and exchange insights (Rhim & Han, 2020). Case studies, role-playing, and hands-on practice opportunities enhance problem-solving skills, communication abilities, and confidence in executing foot examinations according to guidelines (AlMekkawi & El Khalil, 2020; Stolt et al., 2020). These diverse learning activities not only support knowledge acquisition but also equip nursing staff with the collaborative skills needed for successful implementation (Hardie et al., 2022).

Each activity in the NHS FPX6004 Assessment 3 Training Session for Policy Implementation addresses the unique demands of implementing new guidelines. Interactive discussions and case studies deepen participants’ understanding of the guidelines’ rationale and practical implications. Role-playing and hands-on practice refine skills in simulated environments, boosting confidence in patient interactions (Stolt et al., 2020).


The training session underscores evidence-based strategies, early success indicators, and the impact of policies on nursing staff roles. It prioritizes effective implementation through education, engagement, clear communication, and resource allocation. By emphasizing staff buy-in and fostering collaboration, healthcare institutions can achieve sustainable improvements in care quality and organizational effectiveness.


AlMekkawi, M., & El Khalil, R. (2020). New graduate nurses’ readiness to practise: A narrative literature review. Health Professions Education, 6(3), 304–316. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hpe.2020.05.008

Armstrong, D. G., Tan, T.-W., Boulton, A. J. M., & Bus, S. A. (2023). Diabetic foot ulcers: A review. Journal of American Medical Association, 330(1), 62–75. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2023.10578

Bolan, N., Cowgill, K. D., Walker, K., Kak, L., Shaver, T., Moxon, S., & Lincetto, O. (2021). Human resources for health-related challenges to ensuring quality newborn care in low- and middle-income countries: A scoping review. Global Health: Science and Practice, 9(1), 160–176. https://doi.org/10.9745/ghsp-d-20-00362

Cummings, G. G., Lee, S., Tate, K., Penconek, T., Micaroni, S. P. M., Paananen, T., & Chatterjee, G. E. (2020). The essentials of nursing leadership: A systematic review of factors and educational interventions influencing nursing leadership. International Journal of Nursing Studies, 115. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2020.103842

Dorssen‐Boog, P., Vuuren, T., Jong, J. P., & Veld, M. (2021). Facilitating health care workers’ self‐determination: The impact of a self‐leadership intervention on work engagement, health, and performance. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 94(2), 259–281. https://doi.org/10.1111/joop.12352

Finset, A., Bosworth, H., Butow, P., Gulbrandsen, P., Hulsman, R. L., Pieterse, A. H., Street, R., Tschoetschel, R., & van Weert, J. (2020). Effective health communication – A key factor in fighting the COVID-19 pandemic. Patient Education and Counseling, 103(5), 873–876. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pec.2020.03.027

Fujii, K., & Stolt, M. (2020). Intervention study of a foot‐care program enhancing knowledge and practice among nurses and care workers at in‐home service providers. Nursing Open, 7(4), 1039–1051. https://doi.org/10.1002/nop2.479

Fuller, T. E., Pong, D. D., Piniella, N., Pardo, M., Bessa, N., Yoon, C., Boxer, R. B., Schnipper, J. L., & Dalal, A. K. (2020). Interactive digital health tools to engage patients and caregivers in discharge preparation: Implementation study. Journal of Medical Internet Research, 22(4). https://doi.org/10.2196/15573

G, S. B., V, U., Shivaram, J. M., Belehalli, P., A, S. M., C, C. H., Sikkandar, M. Y., & Brioschi, M. L. (2023). Diabetic foot assessment and care: Barriers and facilitators in a cross-sectional study in Bangalore, India. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 20(11). https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph20115929

Hardie, P., Darley, A., Langan, L., Lafferty, A., Jarvis, S., & Redmond, C. (2022). Interpersonal and communication skills development in general nursing preceptorship education and training programmes: A scoping review. Nurse Education in Practice, 65(1). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nepr.2022.103482

Harrison, H., Birks, M., Franklin, R., & Mills, J. (2020). An assessment continuum: How healthcare professionals define and determine practice readiness of newly graduated registered nurses. Collegian, 27(2), 198–206. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.colegn.2019.07.003

Heck, L. O., Carrara, B. S., Mendes, I. A. C., & Arena Ventura, C. A. (2022). Nursing and advocacy in health: An integrative review. Nursing Ethics, 29(4), 1014–1034. https://doi.org/10.1177/09697330211062981

Johnson, K. B., Wei, W., Weeraratne, D., Frisse, M. E., Misulis, K., Rhee, K., Zhao, J., & Snowdon, J. L. (2021). Precision medicine, AI, and the future of personalized health care. Clinical and Translational Science, 14(1), 86–93. https://doi.org/10.1111/cts.12884

Krohn, K. M., Sundberg, M. A., Quadri, N. S., Stauffer, W. M., Dhawan, A., Pogemiller, H., Leuche, V. T., Kesler, S., Gebreslasse, T. H., Shaughnessy, M. K., Pritt, B., Habib, A., Scudder, B., Sponsler, S., Dunlop, S., & Hendel-Paterson, B. (2021). Global health education during the COVID-19 pandemic: Challenges, adaptations, and lessons learned. The American Journal of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene, 105(6), 1463–1467. https://doi.org/10.4269/ajtmh.21-0773

Mazanderani, F., Kirkpatrick, S. F., Ziebland, S., Locock, L., & Powell, J. (2021). Caring for care: Online feedback in the context of public healthcare services. Social Science & Medicine, 285. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2021.114280

Monteiro-Soares, M., Vale-Lima, J., Martiniano, J., Pinheiro-Torres, S., Dias, V., & Boyko, E. J. (2021). A systematic review with meta-analysis of the impact of access and quality of diabetic foot care delivery in preventing lower extremity amputation. Journal of Diabetes and Its Complications, 35(4). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdiacomp.2020.107837

Mullan, L., Wynter, K., Driscoll, A., & Rasmussen, B. (2020). Preventative and early intervention diabetes-related foot care practices in primary care. Australian Journal of Primary Health, 26(2), 161–172. https://doi.org/10.1071/py19183

Penconek, T., Tate, K., Bernardes, A., Lee, S., Micaroni, S. P. M., Balsanelli, A. P., de Moura, A. A., & Cummings, G. G. (2021). Determinants of nurse manager job satisfaction: A systematic review. International Journal of Nursing Studies, 118. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2021.103906

Pereno, A., & Eriksson, D. (2020). A multi-stakeholder perspective on sustainable healthcare: From 2030 onwards. Futures, 122. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.futures.2020.102605

Pranata, S., Wu, S.-F. V., Alizargar, J., Liu, J.-H., Liang, S.-Y., & Lu, Y.-Y. (2021). Precision health care elements, definitions, and strategies for patients with diabetes: A literature review. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 18(12). https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph18126535

Pratt, H., Moroney, T., & Middleton, R. (2020). The influence of engaging authentically on nurse–patient relationships: A scoping review. Nursing Inquiry, 28(2). https://doi.org/10.1111/nin.12388

Rhim, H. C., & Han, H. (2020). Teaching online: Foundational concepts of online learning and practical guidelines. Korean Journal of Medical Education, 32(3), 175–183. https://doi.org/10.3946/kjme.2020.171

Sibounheuang, P., Olson, P. S., & Kittiboonyakun, P. (2020). Patients’ and healthcare providers’ perspectives on diabetes management: A systematic review of qualitative studies. Research in Social and Administrative Pharmacy, 16(7), 854–874. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sapharm.2019.09.001

Siegel, K. R., Ali, M. K., Zhou, X., Ng, B. P., Jawanda, S., Proia, K., Zhang, X., Gregg, E. W., Albright, A. L., & Zhang, P. (2020). Cost-effectiveness of interventions to manage diabetes: Has the evidence changed since 2008? Diabetes Care, 43(7), 1557–1592. https://doi.org/10.2337/dci20-0017

Sorber, R., & Abularrage, C. J. (2021). Diabetic foot ulcers: Epidemiology and the role of multidisciplinary care teams. Seminars in Vascular Surgery, 34(1), 47–53. https://doi.org/10.1053/j.semvascsurg.2021.02.006

Sørensen, M., Groven, K. S., Gjelsvik, B., Almendingen, K., & Garnweidner-Holme, L. (2020). The roles of healthcare professionals in diabetes care: A qualitative study in Norwegian general practice. Scandinavian Journal of Primary Health Care, 38(1), 12–23. https://doi.org/10.1080/02813432.2020.1714145

Spoon, D., Rietbergen, T., Huis, A., Heinen, M., van Dijk, M., van Bodegom-Vos, L., & Ista, E. (2020). Implementation strategies used to implement nursing guidelines in daily practice: A systematic review. International Journal of Nursing Studies, 111. NHS FPX 6008 Assessment 1 Identifying a Local Health Care Economic Issue

Stolt, M., Gattinger, H., Boström, C., & Suhonen, R. (2020). Foot health educational interventions for patients and healthcare professionals: A scoping review. Health Education Journal, 79(4), 390–416.

Leave a Reply