NURS FPX 4020 Assessment 2 Root Cause Analysis and Safety Improvement Plan

In the healthcare industry, nurses should realize the importance of performing root-cause analysis and designing safety improvement plans. As the primary caregivers, the nurses have a major role to play in identifying the system issues that compromise patient safety and quality of care. Nurses are able to uncover the main reasons for adverse events or NURS FPX 4020 Assessment 2 root-cause analysis. One of the most valuable aspects of this comprehensive analysis is the accumulated knowledge, which can be used to generate focused safety improvement strategies that help nurses apply long-term solutions that result in the overall safety and reliability of healthcare provision (Sreeramoju et al., 2020). The assessment aims to identify basic factors, which lead to inadequate patient education in healthcare and develop a plan of improvement in safety.

Root Causes of Specific Patient Safety Issues

Poor patient education in healthcare poses a threat to patient safety- a product of many interrelated problems in an institution. Financial constraints or alternative competing priorities may hinder healthcare facilities from investing in the development of extensive educational materials and employing targeted professionals for patient education (Kasemy et al., 2020). Also, the non-standardized equipment or protocol for patient education in different departments or service points of the organization is very important as well (NURS FPX 4020 Assessment 2). Healthcare providers do not have standard protocols to follow and, hence, they may differ in how they approach patient education leading to gaps and inconsistencies.

Time constraints can have a major impact on the character of patient interactions. Because of the healthcare staff placing emphasis on the urgent medical needs rather than the instructional elements, patient education sessions may be hurried or incomplete (Singh & Matthees, 2021). Therefore, the patients may be confused or disrupted concerning their illness, treatment, or discharge instructions.Incomprehension or confusion due to language and culture differences may sometimes impede the success of patient education. 

NURS FPX 4020 Assessment 2 Root Cause Analysis and Safety Improvement Plan

Patients with different ethnicities, or limited English proficiency, may have difficulties in comprehending medical information in diverse healthcare settings (Pandey et al., 2021). The organizational culture of a health care institution that lacks patient empowerment as a core value may result in poor patient education (Vainauskienė & Vaitkienė, 2021). The motivation to invest in multidimensional educational comprehensive initiatives may dwindle when patients are perceived as passive recipients of information rather than partners in their treatment.

Lastly, the principal causes of deficient patient education in health care include insufficient resources, inconsistent protocols, shortage of time, communication barriers, and organizational view toward involvement of patients. The success in solving complicated problems comes with a complete plan which includes patient education as a critical factor in providing quality care.

Application of Evidence-Based Strategies NURS FPX 4020 Assessment 2

In order to address the issue of the lack of patient education in healthcare, evidence base and best practice approaches that focus on effective communication and patient empowerment must be used. A useful strategy is connected with following standardized guidelines in patient education (Brottman et al., 2019).  Hospitals have the capability to provide simple brochures, films, or online materials that present information on how to take medications, care for oneself following surgery, and manage diseases (Sunkara et al., 2023). Ensuring the reliable and timely delivery of information patients are provided with a chance to make informed decisions about their health, hence reducing the likelihood of mistakes or troubles arising from wrong perceptions.

Another essential way is the health literacy tests. Healthcare professionals might change their teaching methods when the patients who have poor health literacy are identified. Utilization of clear and motivating techniques, for example, NURS FPX 4020 Assessment 2 the use of teach-back method assures comprehension and retention of essential knowledge (Shersher et al., 2020). In addition, if patient education is considered as a specific part of routine medical services, delivered either through nurse counseling or electronic platforms, the accessibility will grow and the knowledge will be maintained over time (Young et al., 2023). Evidence-based initiatives address the problem of insufficient patient education by promoting explicit communication and active patient participation, ultimately leading to better patient safety and health outcomes.

How will Strategies Address Safety Issues?

Better patient education and participation will eliminate the safety issue of poor patient education. A standard patient education regimen help in reducing confusion and errors by providing critical information in a consistent manner (Puertas et al., 2020). For example, leaflets and videos that describe drug usage and side effects help patients to make informed decisions, making medication adherence and safety improved.

Health literacy tests make it possible for the doctors to personalize the patient education in simple language and interactive methods. Patient education in normal care settings such as nurse-led counseling or digital platforms strengthens learning and allows patients to take an active role in their health, thus improving safety and outcomes. These teach-back methods help patients in knowledge and retention of vital knowledge, hence, minimizing self-care and treatment adherence errors (Shersher et al., 2020).

NURS FPX 4020 Assessment 2 Evidence-Based Improvement Plan

The novel, effective safety improvement approach may solve patient education in healthcare. This strategy is to develop an interactive and personalized patient education system by application of current technology to enhance patient understanding and involvement (Wu et al., 2021). A patient-friendly mobile application interface and a website will supply patients with targeted instructional materials according to their disease condition, treatment scheme, and learning style. In order to cater for the diverse learning styles and to achieve maximum understanding, the content will be delivered as videos, animations, and infographics.

Patients’ inquiries will be answered by a virtual assistant in real time, providing support and guidance. Healthcare practitioners will be educated upon how to embed the patient education system into their clinical workflow and encourage patient engagement to ensure plan effectiveness (Miller & Reihlen, 2023; Miura et al., 2022). Patients for instance can evaluate the good quality and the efficiency of the instructional information for improvement of the system. Patient’s awareness and cognition of their health condition and management plan will be monitored periodically to enhance education quality and delivery (Zanaboni et al., 2019). The innovative patient education system may greatly improve patient safety by providing patients with the information and resources to actively participate in their treatment and make informed health choices.

Existing Organizational Resources

Utilizing organizational resources may enhance the safety improvement strategy for lack of patient education. The patients’ education system is adjustable to the EHR system that automatically fills in patients ‘information and treatment plans, therefore tailoring the educational content for each patient (Lyles et al., 2020). The health organization’s clinical experts—doctors, nurses, and health educators—can also review and approve the training material to make it accurate and update. Resources support the implementation and evaluation of the plan.

The IT department could assist in the development, implementation and support of the patient education system and provide technical aid to both patients and healthcare providers (He et al., 2020). The patient advisory council of the organization may provide input on educational material and user interface to ensure the system meets patient requirements (Roennow et al., 2020). Leverage of organizational resources enhances safety improvement strategy, patient education and safety.

Prioritization Based On Potential Impact

Organizational resources need to be prioritized with EHR systems vying for the top spot in terms of their potential impact on the patient education safety improvement strategy. EHR integration offer customized, timely and precise patient education (Lyles et al., 2020). The second group of concerns is clinical specialists which knowledge and skills provide the quality and credibility of instructional materials. Third, IT department should develop and maintain the system (He et al., 2020). Patient education safety improvement strategy should utilize resources of the organization wisely on EHR integration for personalized content, clinical knowledge, IT support, and patient feedback to enhance its effectiveness and how it impacts on patient outcomes.Top of Form

Conclusion

The NURS FPX 4020 Assessment 2 root-cause analysis of not enough patient education in the medical field resulted in the development of a comprehensive safety improvement plan. The plan is going to build the interactive patients education system, which provides patients with the necessary knowledge and resources enabling them to be active in their care with the purpose to increase patients’ safety. This will be achieved through the use of the organization’s existing resources including EHR integration, clinical expertise, IT support, and patient advisory council engagement.

References

Brottman, M. R., Char, D. M., Hattori, R. A., Heeb, R., & Taff, S. D. (2019). Toward cultural competency in health care. Academic Medicine, 95(5), 1. https://doi.org/10.1097/acm.0000000000002995

He, W., Zhang, J., & Li, W. (2020). Information technology solutions, challenges, and suggestions for tackling the covid-19 pandemic. International Journal of Information Management, 57(102287), 102287. NCBI. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2020.102287

Kasemy, Z. A., Babah, W. A., Zewain, S. K., Haggag, M. G., Alkalash, S. H., Zahran, E., & Desouky, D. E. (2020). Knowledge, Attitude and Practice toward COVID-19 among Egyptians. Journal of Epidemiology and Global Health, 10(4). https://doi.org/10.2991/jegh.k.200909.001

Lyles, C. R., Nelson, E. C., Frampton, S., Dykes, P. C., Cemballi, A. G., & Sarkar, U. (2020). Using electronic health record portals to improve patient engagement: Research priorities and best practices. Annals of Internal Medicine, 172(11), 123–129. https://doi.org/10.7326/m19-0876

Miller, T., & Reihlen, M. (2023). Assessing the impact of patient-involvement healthcare strategies on patients, providers, and the healthcare system: A systematic review. Patient Education and Counseling, 107652. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pec.2023.107652

Miura, C., Chen, S., Saiki, S., Nakamura, M., & Yasuda, K. (2022). Assisting personalized healthcare of elderly people: Developing a rule-based virtual caregiver system using mobile chatbot. Sensors, 22(10), 3829. https://doi.org/10.3390/s22103829

Pandey, M., Maina, R. G., Amoyaw, J., Li, Y., Kamrul, R., Michaels, C. R., & Maroof, R. (2021). Impacts of English language proficiency on healthcare access, use, and outcomes among immigrants: A qualitative study. BMC Health Services Research, 21(1), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12913-021-06750-4

Puertas, L. G., Hernández, V. V. M., Puertas, V. G., Granados-Gámez, G., & Aguilera-Manrique, G. (2020). Educational interventions for nursing students to develop communication skills with patients: A systematic review. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 17(7), 2241. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17072241

Roennow, A., Sauvé, M., Welling, J., Riggs, R. J., Kennedy, A. T., Galetti, I., Brown, E., Leite, C., Gonzalez, A., Guiraud, A. P. P., Houÿez, F., Camp, R., Gilbert, A., Gahlemann, M., Moros, L., Flores, J. L. L., Schmidt, F., Sauter, W., & Finnern, H. (2020). Collaboration between patient organisations and a clinical research sponsor in a rare disease condition: Learnings from a community advisory board and best practice for future collaborations. BMJ Open, 10(12), e039473. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2020-039473

Sharma, M. (2021). Theoretical foundations of health education and health promotion. In Google Books. Jones & Bartlett Learning. https://books.google.com/books?hl=en&lr=&id=xoAxEAAAQBAJ&oi=fnd&pg=PP1&dq=The+absence+of+uniform+policies+or+procedures+for+patient+education+throughout+the+organization%27s+many+departments+or+care+sites+is+another+crucial+component&ots=UTjX2aKv4A&sig=bCn_piFq0PSuLoMlRkb0KWF7a1Y

Shersher, V., Haines, T. P., Sturgiss, L., Weller, C., & Williams, C. (2020). Definitions and use of the teach-back method in healthcare consultations with patients: A systematic review and thematic synthesis. Patient Education and Counseling, 104(1). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pec.2020.07.026

Singh, J., & Matthees, B. (2021). Facilitating interprofessional education in an online environment during the covid-19 pandemic: A mixed method study. Healthcare, 9(5), 567. https://doi.org/10.3390/healthcare9050567

Sreeramoju, P. V., Palmore, T. N., Lee, G. M., Edmond, M. B., Patterson, J. E., Sepkowitz, K. A., Goldmann, D. A., Henderson, D. K., & Kaye, K. S. (2020). Institutional quality and patient safety programs: An overview for the healthcare epidemiologist. Infection Control & Hospital Epidemiology, 42(1), 6–17. https://doi.org/10.1017/ice.2020.409

Sunkara, P. R., Powell, L. E., Quick, J. D., & Landis, G. H. (2023). A comprehensive assessment of cleft lip and palate websites and patient education information. ˜the œCleft Palate-Craniofacial Journal, 105566562211491-105566562211491. https://doi.org/10.1177/10556656221149127

Vainauskienė, V., & Vaitkienė, R. (2021). Enablers of patient knowledge empowerment for self-management of chronic disease: An integrative review. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 18(5), 2247. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph18052247

Wu, D., Lowry, P. B., Zhang, D., & Parks, R. F. (2021). Patients’ compliance behavior in a personalized mobile patient education system (PMPES) setting: Rational, social, or personal choices? International Journal of Medical Informatics, 145, 104295. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2020.104295

Young, K., Xiong, T., Pfisterer, K. J., Ng, D., Jiao, T., Lohani, R., Nunn, C., Bryant-Lukosius, D., Rendon, R., Berlin, A., Bender, J., Brown, I., Feifer, A., Gotto, G., Cafazzo, J. A., & Pham, Q. (2023). A qualitative study on healthcare professional and patient perspectives on nurse-led virtual prostate cancer survivorship care. Communications Medicine, 3(1), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1038/s43856-023-00387-6

Zanaboni, P., Kummervold, P. E., Sørensen, T., & Johansen, M. A. (2019). Patients’ use and experiences with online access to electronic health records in Norway: Results from an online survey (Preprint). Journal of Medical Internet Research, 22(2). https://doi.org/10.2196/16144